熊谷俊〇氏（千葉県知事）が、公人が公然と毀損不事実で名誉を毀損していいのかね!その通りだけど。金融関係者絶対＝神？アホ!自己利益追求に真意が無い。
https://x.com/YoichiTakahashi/status/2019602013533905131

これは名誉毀損じゃね。オレは、日銀当座預金付利を金融機関へのお小遣い（3.6兆円/年。金融機関は企業に当座預金付利していない）というので、表向き金融機関は相手をしないが、ALMの専門知識で適正対価でアドバイスを受けているよ。公人が公然と不事実で名誉を毀損していいのかね
そのとおりですね。
https://x.com/fukuda326/status/2018300926591930555
熊谷俊人千葉県知事が高市首相を批判。
知事自身のFacebookで「経済大国の首相として、金融関係者から相手にされないような主張を信じるのはやめてほしい。」千葉日報
こいつ　NTTコミュニケーションズ従業員、民主党からの無所属です。

それ以前に、金融関係者=絶対＝神化しているのがお前宗教かとおもうよ。
そもそも、金融関係者は、自己利益追求に話題をもっていくだろ、投資利確しなければ趣旨に合わない。
起因で市場に左右する説明ができるのであれば通貨、為替、市場なんて皆無でしょう。
投資家や海外メディアの反応は、短期的には資産価格を動かしますが、それが必ずしも国家の長期的利益と一致するとは限りません。
これが”政策”だったら”恐怖”じゃねーの？＝金がある奴が、”世界の政策”を作るって事。
間違いじゃないだろが（マーケットは安定と予測可能性を好む）、抗う事はあるべき姿だろ。
リフレ派とか、ＳＮＳ、トーンの世論の集合は、全く意味ないですよね。
そもそも、熊谷〇人氏（千葉県知事）公人が公然懸念されている「誰をアドバイザーにするか」
これ問題、現代政治における”専門知（Technocracy）vs 政治主導（Decisionism）”の対立そのものを千葉県知事は政策とするというのです。
千葉県知事、政策に全く責任の無い奴が、髙橋氏に言うなら最低限、言葉でなく数字資料をもって説明しろ。
ダボス会議等での否定的な反応は、単なる”未知の政策への警戒感、恐怖”に耐えられない、目先の利益であって、主権じゃない。

高市政権の政策は一貫しています。
それは、既存の報道やアカデミズムが拾いきれなかった”国民の実感（生活苦や閉塞感）、SNS（移ろいやすい消費コンテンツ）”を吸い上げて、
そこに寄り添う”民意への忠実さ”で現法の解釈で集約政策です。
そこにある”国民の実感（生活苦や閉塞感）、SNS（移ろいやすい消費コンテンツ）”に変化する事を是非としている。

———————-

Mr. Toshihito Kumagai (Governor of Chiba Prefecture) said, "Is it okay for a public figure to openly defame someone with false statements?" He’s right. Financial professionals are absolute = god? What an idiot! He has no sincerity in pursuing his own interests.
Isn’t this defamation? I believe that the interest paid on current accounts by the Bank of Japan is pocket money to financial institutions (3.6 trillion yen/year; financial institutions do not pay interest on current accounts to companies), so officially, financial institutions don’t pay me, but I receive advice from ALM’s specialized knowledge at a fair price. Is it okay for a public figure to openly defame someone with false statements?
He’s right.
Chiba Governor Toshihito Kumagai criticized Prime Minister Takaichi.
On his Facebook page, the governor wrote, "As the prime minister of an economic superpower, I want you to stop believing claims that will not be taken seriously by financial professionals." (Chiba Nippo)
This guy is an NTT Communications employee and an independent from the Democratic Party.
More importantly, I think your belief that financial professionals = absolute = deity is a religion.
To begin with, financial professionals will always pursue their own interests; if they don’t realize their investment profits, it doesn’t fit the purpose.
If market influences could be explained by causes, there would be no currencies, exchange rates, or markets.
The reactions of investors and foreign media may move asset prices in the short term, but that doesn’t necessarily align with the long-term interests of the nation.
If this were "policy," wouldn’t it be "fear"? This means that those with money are making "global policy."
That’s not wrong (markets favor stability and predictability), but resistance is the way to go.
The aggregation of public opinion by those who support reflation, social media, and tone is completely meaningless.
First of all, Kumagai (Chiba Prefecture Governor) has publicly expressed concern about "who to appoint as advisor."
The Chiba Prefecture Governor is considering the conflict between "technocracy" and "decisionism" in modern politics as his policy.
Governor Chiba, if you’re someone who has absolutely no responsibility for policy, then if you’re going to tell Takahashi that, at the very least, you should explain with numbers, not just words.
The negative reactions at meetings like the Davos Forum are simply due to a sense of wariness and fear of unknown policies, and are driven by short-term interests, not sovereignty.
The Takaichi administration’s policies are consistent.
They are policies that absorb the "real feelings of the people (hardships and feelings of stagnation) and social media (volatile consumer content)" that existing media and academia have not been able to fully capture,
and then compile them into policies that are "loyal to public opinion" and interpret current law accordingly.
They are determined to transform the "real feelings of the people (hardships and feelings of stagnation) and social media (volatile consumer content)" that are there

———————-
———————-

html>